Kruger E, Schilli W, editors. The strasbourg miniplate osteosynthesis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Postoperative OPG shows reduction and fixation of right parasymphysis fracture with 2. In our study, interpersonal violence accounted for
|License:||For Personal Use Only|
|iPhone 5, 5S resolutions||640×1136|
|iPhone 6, 6S resolutions||750×1334|
|iPhone 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus resolutions||1080×1920|
|Android Mobiles HD resolutions||360×640, 540×960, 720×1280|
|Android Mobiles Full HD resolutions||1080×1920|
|Mobiles HD resolutions||480×800, 768×1280|
|Mobiles QHD, iPhone X resolutions||1440×2560|
|HD resolutions||1280×720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, Original|
The value of 3-dimensional plates in maxillofacial surgery. Also, as the symphysis fractures are under greater degree of torsional strain than any other area of the mandible, 3-D plates provide higher stability in this region.
Table 4 Comparsion of complication between group I and group II. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. No incidence of plate failure was reported in Group I patients, which coincides with the report by Guimond et al. Single miniplate osteosynthesis in angle fracture.
Bipin Rajendran – Google Scholar Citations
Patients of both groups were evaluated for malunion, non-union, damage to root by screw, implant failure, infection at site, neurosensory deficit, occlusal discrepancy, and postoperative mobility at fracture site. Champy M, Pape HD. Three-dimensional designs were formed by joining two 2-D miniplates with interconnecting vertical crossbars.
Presented at 67th meeting of Keio Medical Society; Spiessl[ 1 ] introduced compression plates, which were fixed gipin the lower border of fractured mandible using bicortical screws.
This study consisted of a sample of 28 patients 40 fracture sites divided randomly 3x equally single-blind control trial study into two groups. Out of bbipin patients treated by conventional 2-mm miniplates, 2 patients developed occlusal discrepancy, another 2 had postoperative mobility at fracture site, and 1 developed plate failure and subsequent infection, which was treated by removal of the plate under antibiotic coverage.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
In the body region, difference was not significant, average time of 7 min more was taken bipkn 3-D plates; whereas, in the symphysis and parasymphysis region, 20 min more was taken for 3-D plate fixation than for 2-D miniplates. Three dimensional miniplates rigid fixation in fracture mandible.
One patient treated by 3-dimensional plates had tooth damage. Aligning, moving and re-aligning a specific 3D object inside a 3D object group are performed, through proximity hovering.
One case of tooth damage at the symphysis region was reported among Group I patients. This was a prospective study consisting of a sample size of 28 patients 18 males and 10 females with undisplaced as well as displaced mandible fractures conducted at Govt.
Conventional 2.0 mm miniplates versus 3-D plates in mandibular fractures
Intraoperative photograph of patient showing reduction and fixation of right parasymphysis fracture site with conventional 2. Also, an infection rate of 6. S plates used in the mandible fracture. Open in a separate window. There are two fundamentally different philosophies for the treatment of mandible fracture using plates and screws:.
The 3-D plating system has advantages over conventional 2-D miniplates. Champy revolutionized intraoral fixation by innovating and modifying the Michelet et al. Table 3 Distribution of fracture site, favorability of fracture site, methods of fixation of fracture site. In our study, interpersonal violence accounted for Incidence, etiology, treatment, and complications. None of the bipinn of Group I developed occlusal discrepancy [ Table 4 ].